Skip to content
Back to Guides
3/17/20256 min readProUtility Editorial Team

WebP SEO Myths in 2026: What Google Actually Cares About

Is WebP actually better for SEO? Does Google favor it? We debunk the common myths surrounding next-gen image formats and ranking.

WebP has been around for over a decade, but myths about its SEO impact still persist. Let's separate fact from fiction.

Ideal for: Content Strategists and SEO Beginners.

Last updated: Jan 2026

TL;DR (Quick Answer)

  • Ranking: WebP does not give direct ranking boosts.
  • Speed: Faster images = better Core Web Vitals.
  • Indexing: Google indexes WebP normally.
  • Usage: Use WebP everywhere except editing workflows.

Image Format SEO Workflow (Recommended Order)

  1. Resize image to correct dimensions
  2. Compress image (WebP / AVIF)
  3. Choose the right format (WebP vs JPG vs PNG)
  4. Rename image file descriptively
  5. Add accurate alt text
  6. Upload & index

Does WebP Improve Rankings?

Yes, but indirectly.

Google does not have a "WebP Ranking Boost" algorithm. You won't rank #1 just because you use WebP.

However, Google does rank fast sites higher. Since WebP images are significantly smaller (usually 30-50%) than JPGs, they make your site faster. Therefore, using WebP helps improve ranking signals.

Important Clarification WebP is NOT a direct ranking factor. Google does not rank pages higher simply because they use WebP.

WebP helps SEO indirectly by:

  • Reducing file size
  • Improving Core Web Vitals
  • Increasing page speed

Learn more about Google’s WebP documentation.

  • Increasing page speed

Common WebP SEO Myths

Myth 1: “Google ranks WebP higher than JPG”

🟢 Google-confirmed: ❌ No direct ranking boost.

False. Google ranks fast pages higher. If you have a highly optimized JPG that loads instantly, it’s just as good as a WebP. But achieving that size with JPG is much harder.

Myth 2: “WebP breaks SEO because older browsers can't see it”

🟢 Reality: ❌ Outdated concern.

Outdated. In 2026, WebP support is effectively universal (98%+ coverage). Even Safari and iOS support it fully. Unless your target audience uses Internet Explorer 11, you are safe.

Myth 3: “WebP images don't get indexed in Google Images”

🟢 Reality: ❌ False.

False. Google Images has supported WebP for years. In fact, many top-ranking results in Image Search are now WebP files.

WebP vs AVIF for SEO (Quick Answer)

Google treats WebP and AVIF the same for indexing. Choose based on:

  • AVIF → smallest size, slower encode

  • WebP → best balance, universal support

  • WebP → best balance, universal support

  • Always serve WebP using <picture> with JPG/PNG fallback for legacy support.

SEO impact depends on speed, not format name.

Quick Comparison: JPG vs WebP vs AVIF

Feature JPG WebP AVIF
File Size Large Small (30% less) Smallest (50% less)
Quality High High High
Speed Slow Fast Fastest
SEO Impact Low High (Indirect) High (Indirect)

Real SEO Benefits of WebP

  1. Speed: Smaller files load faster. Speed is a ranking factor (see Core Web Vitals Guide).
  2. Bandwidth: You save money on hosting/CDN costs.
  3. UX: Users see images instantly, reducing bounce rates.

👉 Want faster images AND better SEO?Compress images to WebP in seconds

When WebP Alone Is NOT Enough

WebP improves speed, but SEO also depends on:

  • Proper dimensions
  • Correct lazy loading
  • Optimized LCP images
  • Clean filenames
  • Alt text

👉 Read: Core Web Vitals Guide and Image Optimization Guide (Pillar).

When NOT to Use WebP

There is only one real scenario: Editing workflows. If you offer high-res downloads for people to edit in Photoshop, sticking to high-quality JPG or PNG ensures maximum compatibility with desktop software.

  • Example: A wedding photographer delivering high-res "Print Ready" files should provide full-quality JPGs, not WebP.

But for displaying images on a website? Always use WebP.

Final Verdict

WebP won't magically rank your site. But if you care about speed, Core Web Vitals, and user experience, it's the default choice in 2026.

Rule of Thumb: WebP is not a ranking factor, but in 2026 it is the default format for performance-focused SEO.

How to Convert JPG/PNG to WebP

You can convert your entire library easily.

  1. Take your existing JPGs or PNGs.
  2. Run them through a WebP Converter.
  3. Replace the files on your server.

Optimize Images for Speed (WebP / AVIF)

It is a one-time task that pays SEO dividends forever.

Read Next

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Google prefer WebP over AVIF?
No. Google supports both. AVIF is smaller but slower to encode. WebP is the safest default.
Should I replace all JPGs with WebP?
For websites: yes. For downloads/editing: no.
Will WebP hurt SEO if some browsers don’t support it?
No. Modern browsers support WebP globally. Always use a <picture> fallback or automatic server delivery to ensure compatibility.
Does WebP help Google Discover?
Yes. Faster-loading high-quality images improve your Core Web Vitals, which is a key eligibility factor for Google Discover.
Is AVIF better than WebP for SEO?
AVIF offers better compression but slower generation times. For pure SEO speed, AVIF wins slightly, but WebP is more universally compatible.
Should blogs use WebP?
Absolutely. Blogs are heavy on images. Switching to WebP can reduce page weight by 50%, significantly boosting read times and SEO scores.
Does WebP affect image quality perception?
At 80-85% quality, WebP is indistinguishable from JPG to the human eye, but the file size is drastically smaller.